In combination with fulvestrant for patients with HR+/HER2− aBC or mBC with PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN alterations following progression on or after ET ± CDK4/6i

Advancements in precision medicine

Dr Neil M. Iyengar discusses treatment with TRUQAP + fulvestrant, including results from CAPItello-291, safety, and dosing.

In combination with fulvestrant,

TRUQAP more than doubled mPFS in patients with PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN alterations vs fulvestrant alone1*

mPFS in Patients GraphmPFS in Patients Graph

The median duration of follow-up for the primary analysis of PFS in the ITT population was 13.0 months (range: 0.0 to 25.0) in the TRUQAP + fulvestrant arm and 12.7 months (range: 0.0 to 22.3) in the fulvestrant alone arm1,2

50% reduction1

TRUQAP + fulvestrant delivered reduction in risk of disease progression or death in patients with PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN alterations vs fulvestrant alone

HR=0.50 (95% CI: 0.38–0.65; P<0.0001)

  • A statistically significant difference in PFS was observed in the overall population (N=708) and in patients with PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN alterations (n=289).1
  • An exploratory analysis of PFS in 313 (44%) patients who did not have PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN alterations showed an HR of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.61-1.02), indicating the improvement in PFS in the overall population was primarily due to the PFS results in patients with alterations. FDA approval of TRUQAP + fulvestrant was therefore based on the PFS results seen in patients with PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN alterations.1

NCCN

 
 

CATEGORY 1 PREFERRED

 
 

NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Breast Cancer recommends capivasertib (TRUQAP®) + fulvestrant as a Category 1 Preferred treatment option for HR+/HER2− aBC or mBC with at least one or more PIK3CA or AKT1 activating mutations or PTEN alterations following progression after one or more prior lines of ET, including one line containing a CDK4/6i2

  • *Patients with HR+/HER2− aBC or mBC with PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN alterations following progression on or after ET ± CDK4/6i.1
  • The improvement in mPFS between TRUQAP + fulvestrant vs fulvestrant alone was calculated as 7.3/3.1=2.35.1
  • Stratified Cox proportional hazards model. A hazard ratio <1 favors TRUQAP + fulvestrant. The log-rank test and Cox model stratified by presence of liver metastases (yes vs no) and prior use of CDK4/6i (yes vs no).1

NO biomarker testing required1

with TRUQAP + fulvestrant

In combination with fulvestrant,

Overall survival with TRUQAP at 30% maturity1,3

Overall Survival Rate of TRUQAP GraphOverall Survival Rate of TRUQAP Graph

At the time of data cutoff, a sufficient number of events had not been reached to yield an overall survival rate3

TRUQAP + fulvestrant delivered an objective response rate of 26%—fulvestrant alone was 8%1,3

ORR=26% (CR=2.3%; PR=23%) vs 8% (CR=0%; PR=8%), respectively (investigator assessed)

  • CBR=CR+PR+SD sustained for 24 weeks with TRUQAP + fulvestrant was 56% (n=155)—fulvestrant alone was 28% (n=134)3

Median duration of response was 10.2 months (95% CI: 7.7-NC) with TRUQAP + fulvestrant—fulvestrant alone was 8.6 months (95% CI: 3.8-9.2)

In combination with fulvestrant,

TRUQAP delivered consistent mPFS benefit across subgroups3*

Investigator-assessed mPFS by subgroup3

Exploratory Analysis of Prespecified Subgroups TableExploratory Analysis of Prespecified Subgroups TableExploratory Analysis of Prespecified Subgroups TableExploratory Analysis of Prespecified Subgroups Table
  • *Exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups. Study was not powered to show statistical significance.3
  • Per ESO-ESMO guidelines: Primary endocrine resistance=relapse while on the first 2 years of adjuvant ET, or PD within first 6 months of 1L ET for mBC, while on ET. Secondary resistance=relapse while on adjuvant ET after the first 2 years, or relapse within 12 months of completing adjuvant ET, or PD ≥6 months after initiating ET for mBC, while on ET.4

View patient
demographics

Baseline

Discover tolerability
profile

Safety