rPFS

In combination with abiraterone/prednisone,

TRUQAP improved median rPFS by ~8 months vs abi/pred in PTEN-deficient mAPMN/S prostate cancer1

TRUQAP® (capivasertib) + abi/pred demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in rPFS vs abi/pred

TRUQAP Efficacy in Combination With Abi/Pred From Capitello-281TRUQAP Efficacy in Combination With Abi/Pred From Capitello-281

*Investigator-assessed rPFS.

Kaplan-Meier curve depicting TRUQAP efficacy in combination with abi/pred from CAPItello-281. Median rPFS was 33.2 months with TRUQAP + abi/pred (n=507; 95% CI: 25.8-44.2) vs 25.7 months with placebo + abi/pred (n=505; 95% CI: 22.0-29.9). HR is 0.81 (95% CI: 0.66-0.98; P=0.034).1

NCCN

CATEGORY 1 PREFERRED


NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Breast Cancer recommends capivasertib (TRUQAP®) + fulvestrant as a Category 1 Preferred treatment option for HR+/HER2- aBC or mBC with at least one or more PIK3CA or AKT1 activating mutations or PTEN alterations following progression after one or more prior lines of ET, including one line containing a CDK4/6i2

TRUQAP + abi/pred demonstrated consistent results in rPFS across a majority of patient subgroups2

Subgroup HR And PFS Analysis with TRUQAP vs PlaceboSubgroup HR And PFS Analysis with TRUQAP vs Placebo

Exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups. Study was not powered to show statistical significance.

*High metastatic volume of disease is defined as the presence of visceral metastasis and/or 4 or more bone lesions with 1 or more beyond the vertebral bodies and pelvis using CT or MRI for soft tissue and bone scan for bone lesions.2

High risk is defined in this study as having at least 2 of the following 3 factors: a Gleason Score of ≥8, 4 or more bone lesions, and the presence of measurable visceral metastasis.2

Forest plot of subgroup analysis comparing TRUQAP + abi/pred to placebo + abi/pred in the CAPItello-281 trial. Subgroups analyzed include all patients with PTEN-deficient mAPMN/S prostate cancer, age (<65 years, ≥65 years), ECOG Performance Status (0, 1), Gleason Score (<8, ≥8), volume of disease (high-volume with visceral mets, high-volume without visceral mets, low-volume), lung or liver metastases, baseline PSA (≤median [6.415 ng/mL], >median [6.415 ng/mL]), and disease risk (high risk, low risk).2

Overall Survival

In combination with abiraterone /prednisone,

Overall survival at 26% maturity1

Overall survival data for TRUQAP + abi/pred were immature at the time of the rPFS analysis

Overall Survival Curve TRUQAP vs PlaceboOverall Survival Curve TRUQAP vs Placebo

Kaplan-Meier curve showing overall survival in patients with mAPMN/S prostate cancer and PTEN-deficient tumors, comparing TRUQAP + abi/pred with placebo + abi/pred over 48 months from randomization. HR is 0.90 (95% CI: 0.71-1.15).2

  • At the time of data cutoff, a sufficient number of events had not been reached to yield an overall survival rate2

  • The OS results are not yet mature and conclusions cannot be made1

Additional secondary endpoints for TRUQAP + abi/pred2

Secondary endpoints TRUQAP + abi/pred
(n=507)
TRUQAP + abi/pred
(n=507)
Placebo + abi/pred
(n=505)
Placebo + abi/pred
(n=505)
HR
(95% CI)
Median time to castration
resistance
n events (%)
185
(36.5)
months
29.5
n events (%)
231
(45.7)
months
22.0
0.77
(0.63–0.94)
Skeletal events 150
(29.6)
42.5 176
(34.9)
37.3 0.82
(0.66-1.02)
Secondary
endpoints
TRUQAP + abi/
pred
(n=507)
Placebo + abi/
pred
(n=505)
n events (%)
Median time to castration resistance 185
(36.5)
231
(45.7)
Skeletal events 150
(29.6)
176
(34.9)
Secondary
endpoints
TRUQAP + abi/
pred
(n=507)
Placebo + abi/
pred
(n=505)
months
Median time to castration resistance 29.5 22.0
Skeletal events 42.5 37.3
Secondary
endpoints
HR (95% CI)
Median time to castration resistance 0.77
(0.63–0.94)
Skeletal events 0.82
(0.66–1.02)

Time to castration resistance: Time from randomization to the first castration-resistant event (radiographic disease progression, PSA progression, or SSE), whichever occurs first, at castrate levels of testosterone (below 50 ng/dL).2

Skeletal events defined as any of the following: Use of radiation therapy to prevent or relieve skeletal symptoms; occurrence of new symptomatic pathological bone fractures (vertebral or non-vertebral), radiologic documentation is required; a pathological fracture, as determined by investigator, is defined as associated with low or no trauma and deemed to have occurred at a site of bone metastasis; occurrence of spinal cord compression, radiologic documentation is required; orthopedic surgical intervention for bone metastasis.2

Secondary endpoints cannot be formally tested until OS reaches statistical significance.2

Exploratory PTEN Subgroup Data

In CAPItello-281,

Exploratory post hoc analysis of PTEN-deficient subgroups2

rPFS in patients by PTEN cutoff

PTEN Cutoff Subgroup HR Analysis TRUQAP vs PlaceboPTEN Cutoff Subgroup HR Analysis TRUQAP vs Placebo

The exploratory post hoc analyses detailed above are descriptive only. CAPItello-281 was not designed to assess statistical significance in subgroup analyses. Results should be interpreted with caution.2

Forest plot of subgroup analysis comparing rPFS with TRUQAP + abi/pred and placebo + abi/pred by PTEN cutoff level in the CAPItello-281 trial. Subgroups analyzed include patients with PTEN-deficient mAPMN/S prostate cancer with no PTEN staining in ≥90%* of cells, ≥95% of cells, ≥99% of cells, and 100% of cells.2

rPFS in patients with PTEN cutoffs of ≥90%,* ≥95%, ≥99%, and 100%2

Four Kaplan-Meier curves comparing the median rPFS with TRUQAP + abi/pred vs placebo + abi/pred at different PTEN cutoff levels. Subgroups analyzed include patients with PTEN-deficient mAPMN/S prostate cancer with no PTEN staining in ≥90%, ≥95%, ≥99%, and 100% of cells.2

Exploratory post hoc analyses are descriptive only. CAPItello-281 was not designed to assess statistical significance in subgroup analyses. Results should be interpreted with caution.2

Patients with PTEN-deficient mAPMN/S prostate cancer need a targeted treatment approach3

*All randomized patients in CAPItello-281.2

Trial Design

In CAPItello-281,

TRUQAP + abi/pred was compared with abi/pred1

CAPItello-281: A global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial (N=1,012)1,2

TRUQAP Trial Design in PTEN mAPMN/S Prostate CancerTRUQAP Trial Design in PTEN mAPMN/S Prostate Cancer

Graphic illustrating the design of the CAPItello-281 trial of TRUQAP in combination with abiraterone and prednisone for patients with de novo PTEN-deficient mHSPC.2

In the trial, 507 patients received 400 mg of TRUQAP and 505 patients received 400 mg of placebo, given orally twice daily for 4 days followed by 3 days off each week. All patients received abiraterone 1000 mg once daily, which includes 5 mg prednisone or prednisolone once daily as well, in addition to androgen deprivation therapy.1,2

Primary endpoint1

  • Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS)

Secondary endpoints1,2

  • Overall survival (OS)
  • Time to castration resistance
  • Skeletal events

Exploratory post hoc analysis2

  • PTEN deficiency subgroups

*Abiraterone dosing includes 5 mg of prednisone/prednisolone once daily.1

Baseline Characteristics

Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment arms in CAPItello-2812

In patients with PTEN-deficient tumors

Baseline characteri-stics2 TRUQAP + abi/pred (n=507) Placebo + abi/pred (n=505)
Median age, years (range)
67 (42–87)
68 (43–88)
Race, n (%)    
White
266 (52.5)
259 (51.3)
Asian
186 (36.7)
189 (37.4)
Black or African American
6 (1.2)
6 (1.2)
Other
23 (4.5)
25 (5.0)
Unknown
26 (5.1)
26 (5.1)
ECOG Performance Status, n (%)    
0
329 (64.9)
320 (63.4)
1
178 (35.1)
185 (36.6)
Gleason Score, n (%)    
<8
94 (18.5)
95 (18.8)
≥8
398 (78.5)
399 (79.0)
Unknown
15 (3.0)
11 (2.2)
Volume of disease, n (%)    
High* with visceral mets
98 (19.3)
95 (18.8)
High* without visceral mets
276 (54.4)
283 (56.0)
Low
131 (25.8)
126 (25.0)
Unknown
2 (0.4)
1 (0.2)
Liver or lung metastases, n (%)    
Yes
90 (17.8)
88 (17.4)
No
417 (82.2)
417 (82.6)
Baseline PSA, n (%)    
≤Median at baseline (6.415 ng/mL)
260 (51.3)
242 (47.9)
>Median at baseline (6.415 ng/mL)
245 (48.3)
256 (50.7)
Unknown
2 (0.4)
7 (1.4)
Disease risk, n (%)    
High
311 (61.3)
333 (65.9)
Low
184 (36.3)
164 (32.5)
Unknown
12 (2.4)
8 (1.6)

Patients exhibited a range of disease volumes and risk levels2

*High metastatic volume of disease is defined as the presence of visceral metastasis and/or 4 or more bone lesions with 1 or more beyond the vertebral bodies and pelvis using CT or MRI for soft tissue and bone scan for bone lesions.2

High risk is defined in this study as having at least 2 of the following 3 factors: a Gleason Score of ≥8, 4 or more bone lesions, and the presence of measurable visceral metastasis.2

Discover the TRUQAP mechanism of action

See the mechanism of action

Explore the TRUQAP safety profile

Explore safety data

abi=abiraterone; ADT=androgen deprivation therapy; BID=bis in die (twice daily); CT=computed tomography; ECOG=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; GnRH=gonadotropin-releasing hormone; HR=hazard ratio; IHC=immunohistochemistry; LHRH=luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone; mets=metastases; mAPMN/S=metastatic androgen pathway modulation-naïve/sensitive; mHSPC=metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; MRI=magnetic resonance imaging; NC=not calculable; Pred=prednisone; PSA=prostate-specific antigen; PTEN=phosphatase and tensin homolog; SSE=symptomatic skeletal event; WHO=World Health Organization.

References: 1. TRUQAP® (capivasertib) [prescribing information]. Wilmington, DE: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; 2026. 2. Fizazi K, Clarke NW, De Santis M, et al. Capivasertib plus abiraterone in PTEN-deficient metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: CAPItello-281 phase III study. Ann Oncol. 2026;37(1):53-68. doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2025.10.004 [including the Supplementary Appendix] 3. Jamaspishvili T, Berman DM, Ross AE, et al. Clinical implications of PTEN loss in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2018;15(4):222-234. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2018.9